2023 has been a roller coaster of a year for healthcare equities. A stronger-than-expected January faded throughout the balance of Q1. A sense of stability, and even some generalist engagement, around the end of the summer rolled into a bruising September pull-back that worsened in October. And, just as investors were ready to declare 2023 as one of the worst years in memory, November brought a rally that has put the sector indices within striking distance of ending the year in the black. And, along the way some turmoil among regional banks further added to the chaos.

While each sub-sector has faced its own unique challenges, a few common themes emerged:
Despite the sector’s underperformance, healthcare capital formation increased relative to last year. Aggregate deal value was up across biotech and non-biotech alike, with the re-emergence of some larger deals that had been missing throughout 2022. The $30B raised this year represents a 39% increase vs last year, and only 9% less than the 2013-2019 (pre-covid) average.

From many perspectives, it was a productive year for the biotech sub-sector. Issuance was up in aggregate, M&A deals were happening, and there were streaks of positive clinical and regulatory events. However, throughout much of the year, it felt as though the default sentiment was negative and the bar was extremely high to reach “escape velocity.”
On most days, the answer to the question, “Why is the XBI moving [in either direction]?” was, directly or indirectly, “the Fed.” There is no denying the impact that the historically rapid rate-hiking cycle has had on the sector. While there are some direct impacts to DCFs in terms of the present value of distant-future earnings, most of the impact boiled down to sentiment around when generalists may feel safe, let alone compelled, to wade back into a sector with low liquidity and risks aplenty. Regulatory concerns from the FTC and the impact of the IRA also added some unwelcome nuance.

The haves and have-nots dynamic played out in a few different ways within biotech:

With investors crowding into a small number of common themes and companies, everyone else has been forced to reckon with the challenging financing environment. Shareholders are demanding that companies do everything possible to bring spend under control and maximize the value of every dollar. Announced workforce reductions were up over 50% compared to last year, and each passing quarter brought portfolio rationalizations, discontinuations and strategic alternative processes.
And, for the first time in at least 10 years, the year will end with fewer public biotechs than when it began.

It was a similarly challenging year for much of the public healthcare universe beyond biotech. The S&P healthcare index has been below water for substantially the whole year as investors evaluate whether sentiment and valuations have sufficiently reset to reward strong execution.
The Fed’s impact was felt as debt became more expensive at the same time equity valuations compressed, leaving nowhere to turn for cheap funding. Sponsor M&A activity has been dampened by the heightened cost of capital, and the spectre of a potential recession loomed large for much of the year.
Here too, haves and have-nots emerged as investors triaged which sub-sectors were sufficiently safe to wade back into:

And, the focus on profitability, or at least a roadmap thereto, has played out across the market. Growth-at-any-cost has fallen out of favor, and many of the high-flying growth stories of the bull market have been among the hardest hit.

As we look forward, we’re optimistic that declining rates, continued M&A, and reasonable valuations can make next year a productive one for the capital markets.

With strong execution against more grounded business plans, we can once again restart the cycle of value creation and capital redeployment that fuels the sector. As the high watermarks of the COVID era fade from memory, more and more sellers will wade back into the market opportunistically. And, the number of high quality private companies that would make attractive public stocks has never been greater. We’re aware of dozens of IPO candidates that are closely monitoring the market, and several have taken tangible steps to preserve the option to go public in the first half of next year. Investor interest in meeting these companies has been strong, with full testing-the-waters schedules and well-attended private company conferences, though it remains to be seen how that ultimately translates in terms of breadth of new investor participation.
Encouragingly, healthcare investors continue to raise large funds and actively evaluate new opportunities, which is a testament to the sector’s resilience and its importance, to the economy and society as a whole.
We hope you find time to relax and recharge over the holiday season, and we look forward to helping you navigate the ever-changing healthcare landscape in 2024.
Cheers!
The Center for Pharmacoeconomics (“CPE”) is a division of MEDACorp LLC (“MEDACorp”). CPE is committed to advancing the understanding and evaluating the economic and societal benefits of healthcare treatments in the United States. Through its thought leadership, evaluations, and advisory services, CPE supports decisions intended to improve societal outcomes. MEDACorp, an affiliate of Leerink Partners LLC (“Leerink Partners”), maintains a global network of independent healthcare professionals providing industry and market insights to Leerink Partners and its clients. The information provided by the Center for Pharmacoeconomics is intended for the sole use of the recipient, is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute investment or other advice or a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security, product, or service. The information has been obtained from sources that we believe reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice, and any opinions and information contained herein are as of the date of this material, and MEDACorp does not undertake any obligation to update them. This document may not be reproduced, edited, or circulated without the express written consent of MEDACorp.
© 2026 MEDACorp LLC. All Rights Reserved.
MEDACorp has received funding to examine the potential impact of federal policies and activities on the market incentives for generic and biosimilar entry.
The Center for Pharmacoeconomics (“CPE”) is a division of MEDACorp LLC (“MEDACorp”). CPE is committed to advancing the understanding and evaluating the economic and societal benefits of healthcare treatments in the United States. Through its thought leadership, evaluations, and advisory services, CPE supports decisions intended to improve societal outcomes. MEDACorp, an affiliate of Leerink Partners LLC (“Leerink Partners”), maintains a global network of independent healthcare professionals providing industry and market insights to Leerink Partners and its clients. The information provided by the Center for Pharmacoeconomics is intended for the sole use of the recipient, is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute investment or other advice or a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security, product, or service. The information has been obtained from sources that we believe reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice, and any opinions and information contained herein are as of the date of this material, and MEDACorp does not undertake any obligation to update them. This document may not be reproduced, edited, or circulated without the express written consent of MEDACorp.
© 2026 MEDACorp LLC. All Rights Reserved.
MEDACorp has received funding to examine the potential impact of federal policies and activities on the market incentives for generic and biosimilar entry.
The Center for Pharmacoeconomics (“CPE”) is a division of MEDACorp LLC (“MEDACorp”). CPE is committed to advancing the understanding and evaluating the economic and societal benefits of healthcare treatments in the United States. Through its thought leadership, evaluations, and advisory services, CPE supports decisions intended to improve societal outcomes. MEDACorp, an affiliate of Leerink Partners LLC (“Leerink Partners”), maintains a global network of independent healthcare professionals providing industry and market insights to Leerink Partners and its clients. The information provided by the Center for Pharmacoeconomics is intended for the sole use of the recipient, is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute investment or other advice or a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security, product, or service. The information has been obtained from sources that we believe reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice, and any opinions and information contained herein are as of the date of this material, and MEDACorp does not undertake any obligation to update them. This document may not be reproduced, edited, or circulated without the express written consent of MEDACorp.
© 2026 MEDACorp LLC. All Rights Reserved.
MEDACorp has received funding to examine the potential impact of federal policies and activities on the market incentives for generic and biosimilar entry.